instagram pinterest linkedin facebook twitter goodreads facebook circle twitter circle linkedin circle instagram circle goodreads circle pinterest circle

Maps of Reconciliation:
Literature and the Ethical Imagination [Vol.19 No.2]


     In the opening years of a new century who wishes to think of the final years? And yet, the old ways—war, the colonies—are worn out. What once served, or, truly, what once served only a few, is no longer feasible. The siren song of technology, to be sure, still courts an audience, the dazzle and promise of its solutions continue to make a plausible case, and its acolytes, with just a flicker of condescension, ask us for more time, more leeway.
     The old ways, the path of the pirate and the conquistador, are worn out, but still we acquiesce. Who will say no when improved inoculations are guaranteed, just there in the wings? When it’s time to move forward, who wants to say the game is over? With so much on the table, who wishes to say no to another role of the dice?
     The elders. As if with one voice, eerie as a solar eclipse, from Tibet to Tierra del Fuego, these historians of the workable now speak the same words. What are the words? What are their prescriptions? Without a book, a program, a charismatic—at the very least a crude map—how are we to know?
     The neurologists and paleoarcheologists tell us something happened fifty thousand years ago in Africa—perhaps it was the dawn of imagination—and hunter-gatherers became, overnight, something else. Us. We then moved swiftly, more swiftly than any driven animal before us, toward our destiny—the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, T’ang dynasty literature, the Constitution of the United States of America, Birkenau, the artificial heart. Then there were too many of us, and there was too much stuff, though, horribly, not enough for everyone. And those who said there was not enough, enough of whatever it might take to make more stuff, were asking to be stoned by those who saw themselves as our saviors, who cursed the pessimism of the backward.
     And then the climate changed. And in the protracted and preternatural silence that followed, as if the slumping of a road had pitched a bus load of children into the steep walls of a deep canyon, it was time to think out our destiny all over again. This time without words like profit, conquer, or killing fields.
     Someone will have to make an outline, draw a map and pass it around, with a pencil and an eraser and no thought of ownership. The voices of individual authorship and the duly elected will need to give way to the repositories of community wisdom. For the first time in centuries, wisdom will need to be seated beside intelligence, a second light cutting the deep and unknowable dark.
     Where once we might have begun pursuing another destiny with more (justifiable) war and additional (reluctant) enforcements of will, with vetted doctrines and the ruthlessness of reason, we might now begin with reconciliation. And with a capacity for reverence. In place of a single belligerent epistemology and the self-assurance of its promoters, reverence for all that lies beyond human control. In place of indifference, compassion. In place of a brave army, courageous people.
     The true test of usefulness for the human imagination is in the invention of a life never before lived. The creation of a way in the world to which no one now, anywhere, is privy. We begin with the scraps of what seems right, and with the hope that what is now invisible is in fact possible, even if not likely in our lifetime.
     We start with our instinct for reconciliation, to address the war in ourselves, the war in our kitchens, the war in Sudan.

—Barry Lopez